The simple fact about early treatment for Covid-19: "NOT ALLOWED !"

January 19, 2022
ChesterView says:


The early studies of HCQ were deliberately sabotaged by Gates funded organizations (e.g. The Oxford RECOVERY trials: https://principia-scientific.com/is-this-murder-uk-hcq-trials-deliberately-overdosed-patients/) or were entirely fabricated, such as the famous LancetGate debacle ( https://www.spectator.com.au/2020/06/lancet-gate/ ). In France, HCQ, which had always been an over the counter medication due to the prevalence of African travel (it is used as anti malarial),was suddenly pulled from pharmacies in February of 2020 and made exclusively a hospital medication, thereby rendering it ineffective (by the time someone is in the hospital the viral phase of the disease is mostly past and so an antiviral like HCQ is useless at that point).

The story with ivermectin is not quite as sordid, in that fraudulent science was not used against it; rather it has been ignored, then censored, and now actively suppressed. Insurers, for example, are now threatening in-network doctors with expulsion from their systems if it is prescribed, even going so far as to warn them that they will be referred to their medical licensing boards for disciplinary action ( https://tinyurl.com/2p8mrsx4 ).

And finally, vitamin D. It has been suspected since the summer of 2020 that vitamin D deficiency plays a large role in serious Covid outcomes, since almost all people dying from the disease are vitamin D deficient. (Dr. Fauci, in an email exchange from that timeframe, himself admitted to taking 6000 IUs of D every day.) Furthermore, if one has a D level above 60 ng/ml deaths from Covid are essentially non-existent. Given these facts, why not a word about D levels from our national health leaders? If saving lives was the main goal, I would think that the simple message to take D would be shouted from the rooftops. In this case, silence really was violence.

The total weight of these curious facts, and many others too numerous to list here, must lead one to seriously suspect, if not conclude, that the claim by our health authorities that their efforts are focused on doing what is best for public health is simply false and that they are not acting in good faith.

And if someone is not acting in good faith, why trust anything that they say? Including, and perhaps most importantly, about vaccines.